Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

OpenHands vs Letta

OpenHands vs Letta compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. AI developer that writes and runs code vs Stateful agents with long-term memory.

Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

OpenHands vs Letta at a glance

SpecOpenHandsLetta
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeAutonomous coding agentAgent runtime (memory)
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalSelf-hosted
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useAdvancedAdvanced
Best forautonomous end-to-end coding tasksagents that remember across sessions
GitHub stars23.9k

How OpenHands and Letta score

🏆 Overall edge: Letta — 4.1 vs 3.7 / 5
CriterionOpenHandsLetta
Popularityn/a3.5
Maintenancen/a5.0
Ease of use2.52.5
Privacy3.54.5
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

OpenHands

Autonomous coding agent · MIT

OpenHands (formerly OpenDevin) is an autonomous software-engineering agent that can write code, run commands, browse the web and fix issues like a human developer.

  • Acts like a real developer: edits, runs, tests
  • Strong SWE-bench performance
  • Open alternative to Devin
Visit OpenHands →

Letta

Agent runtime (memory) · Apache-2.0

Letta (formerly MemGPT) is a framework and server for building stateful agents with long-term memory that persists across sessions, with a visual agent editor.

  • Persistent long-term agent memory
  • Server with REST API and visual editor
  • Model-agnostic and self-hostable
See the Letta page →

Key differences

OpenHands is autonomous coding agent, while Letta is agent runtime (memory). Their licenses differ (MIT vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs Self-hosted). In short, OpenHands fits autonomous end-to-end coding tasks, and Letta fits agents that remember across sessions.

Which should you choose?

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenHands or Letta easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Advanced). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are OpenHands and Letta free?

OpenHands is free and open source (MIT), and Letta is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run OpenHands and Letta locally?

OpenHands: cloud-optional · Letta: self-hosted. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

OpenHands vs Letta — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →