Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

OpenHands vs Agno

OpenHands vs Agno compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. AI developer that writes and runs code vs Fast, lightweight multi-modal agents.

Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools.

OpenHands vs Agno at a glance

SpecOpenHandsAgno
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeAutonomous coding agentAgent framework
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalCloud-optional
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useAdvancedIntermediate
Best forautonomous end-to-end coding tasksfast agents with memory and tools
GitHub stars41.3k

How OpenHands and Agno score

🤝 Too close to call — OpenHands and Agno land within a hair (3.7 vs 3.9 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionOpenHandsAgno
Popularityn/a4.0
Maintenancen/a5.0
Ease of use2.53.5
Privacy3.53.5
License freedom5.03.5

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

OpenHands

Autonomous coding agent · MIT

OpenHands (formerly OpenDevin) is an autonomous software-engineering agent that can write code, run commands, browse the web and fix issues like a human developer.

  • Acts like a real developer: edits, runs, tests
  • Strong SWE-bench performance
  • Open alternative to Devin
Visit OpenHands →

Agno

Agent framework · MPL-2.0

Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight, high-performance framework for building multi-modal agents with memory, knowledge and tools, plus a monitoring UI.

  • Very fast agent instantiation
  • Built-in memory, knowledge and tools
  • Multi-modal and model-agnostic
See the Agno page →

Key differences

OpenHands is autonomous coding agent, while Agno is agent framework. Their licenses differ (MIT vs MPL-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. OpenHands leans more advanced-friendly, whereas Agno is more suited to intermediate users. In short, OpenHands fits autonomous end-to-end coding tasks, and Agno fits fast agents with memory and tools.

Which should you choose?

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenHands or Agno easier to use?

Agno is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while OpenHands rewards more setup with more control.

Are OpenHands and Agno free?

OpenHands is free and open source (MIT), and Agno is free and open source (MPL-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run OpenHands and Agno locally?

OpenHands: cloud-optional · Agno: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

OpenHands vs Agno — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →