Open-Source AI · Coding assistant

Continue vs Cline

Continue vs Cline compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open-source autocomplete and chat in your IDE vs Autonomous coding agent in VS Code.

Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai

Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Cline for developers who want an agentic, multi-step coder.

Continue vs Cline at a glance

SpecContinueCline
CategoryCoding assistantCoding assistant
TypeIDE extensionIDE agent
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalCloud-optional
Primary languageTypeScriptTypeScript
Ease of useBeginnerIntermediate
Best fordevelopers who want a customizable in-IDE copilotdevelopers who want an agentic, multi-step coder
GitHub stars35k64.9k

Feature comparison

FeatureContinueCline
Autocomplete
Chat
Agent mode
Local models
Multi-IDE
Self-hostable

How Continue and Cline score

🤝 Too close to call — Continue and Cline land within a hair (4.5 vs 4.3 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionContinueCline
Popularity4.04.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use5.03.5
Privacy3.53.5
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Continue

IDE extension · Apache-2.0

Continue is an open-source IDE extension for VS Code and JetBrains that brings autocomplete, chat and edits using any model, including local ones via Ollama.

  • Works in VS Code and JetBrains
  • Bring any model, including local via Ollama
  • Highly customizable context and commands
See the Continue page →

Cline

IDE agent · Apache-2.0

Cline is an autonomous coding agent for VS Code that can plan, edit files, run commands and use the browser, with your approval at each step.

  • Agentic: plans, edits, runs commands, browses
  • Human-in-the-loop approval for safety
  • Works with many model providers
See the Cline page →

Key differences

Continue is iDE extension, while Cline is iDE agent. Continue leans more beginner-friendly, whereas Cline is more suited to intermediate users. In short, Continue fits developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot, and Cline fits developers who want an agentic, multi-step coder.

Which should you choose?

Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Cline for developers who want an agentic, multi-step coder.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or Cline easier to use?

Continue is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Cline rewards more setup with more control.

Are Continue and Cline free?

Continue is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Cline is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Continue and Cline locally?

Continue: cloud-optional · Cline: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Continue vs Cline — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Cline for developers who want an agentic, multi-step coder.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →