Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

AutoGPT vs Letta

AutoGPT vs Letta compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. The original autonomous GPT agent vs Stateful agents with long-term memory.

Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai

Choose AutoGPT for building autonomous goal-driven agents. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

AutoGPT vs Letta at a glance

SpecAutoGPTLetta
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeAutonomous agent platformAgent runtime (memory)
LicensePolyform ShieldApache-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalSelf-hosted
Primary languagePython / TSPython
Ease of useAdvancedAdvanced
Best forbuilding autonomous goal-driven agentsagents that remember across sessions
GitHub stars185.6k23.9k

How AutoGPT and Letta score

🤝 Too close to call — AutoGPT and Letta land within a hair (3.9 vs 4.1 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionAutoGPTLetta
Popularity5.03.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use2.52.5
Privacy3.54.5
License freedom3.55.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

AutoGPT

Autonomous agent platform · Polyform Shield

AutoGPT is a platform for building, deploying and running autonomous AI agents that chain tasks together to pursue a goal with minimal human input.

  • Pioneered the autonomous-agent pattern
  • Low-code agent builder and blocks
  • Huge community and ecosystem
See the AutoGPT page →

Letta

Agent runtime (memory) · Apache-2.0

Letta (formerly MemGPT) is a framework and server for building stateful agents with long-term memory that persists across sessions, with a visual agent editor.

  • Persistent long-term agent memory
  • Server with REST API and visual editor
  • Model-agnostic and self-hostable
See the Letta page →

Key differences

AutoGPT is autonomous agent platform, while Letta is agent runtime (memory). Their licenses differ (Polyform Shield vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs Self-hosted). In short, AutoGPT fits building autonomous goal-driven agents, and Letta fits agents that remember across sessions.

Which should you choose?

Choose AutoGPT for building autonomous goal-driven agents. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoGPT or Letta easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Advanced). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are AutoGPT and Letta free?

AutoGPT is free and open source (Polyform Shield), and Letta is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run AutoGPT and Letta locally?

AutoGPT: cloud-optional · Letta: self-hosted. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

AutoGPT vs Letta — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose AutoGPT for building autonomous goal-driven agents. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →