Agno vs 
SWE-agent
Agno vs SWE-agent compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Fast, lightweight multi-modal agents vs Agent that fixes GitHub issues.
Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai
Agno vs SWE-agent at a glance
| Spec | Agno | SWE-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI agent framework | AI agent framework |
| Type | Agent framework | Autonomous issue-fixing agent |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Runs locally | Cloud-optional | Cloud-optional |
| Primary language | Python | Python |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Advanced |
| Best for | fast agents with memory and tools | automated bug fixing on real repos |
| GitHub stars | 41.3k | 19.9k |
How Agno and SWE-agent score
| Criterion | Agno | SWE-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Maintenance | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| License freedom | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Agno
Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight, high-performance framework for building multi-modal agents with memory, knowledge and tools, plus a monitoring UI.
- Very fast agent instantiation
- Built-in memory, knowledge and tools
- Multi-modal and model-agnostic
SWE-agent
SWE-agent from Princeton turns an LLM into an autonomous agent that fixes bugs in real GitHub repositories using a purpose-built agent-computer interface.
- Strong results on SWE-bench
- Purpose-built agent-computer interface
- Research-grade and reproducible
Key differences
Agno is agent framework, while SWE-agent is autonomous issue-fixing agent. Their licenses differ (MPL-2.0 vs MIT), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Agno leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas SWE-agent is more suited to advanced users. In short, Agno fits fast agents with memory and tools, and SWE-agent fits automated bug fixing on real repos.
Which should you choose?
Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose SWE-agent for automated bug fixing on real repos.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agno or SWE-agent easier to use?
Agno is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while SWE-agent rewards more setup with more control.
Are Agno and SWE-agent free?
Agno is free and open source (MPL-2.0), and SWE-agent is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Agno and SWE-agent locally?
Agno: cloud-optional · SWE-agent: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Agno vs SWE-agent — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose SWE-agent for automated bug fixing on real repos.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →