AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Hy3 Open vs GPT-5.6 Sol Paid

Hy3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Hy3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol specs

SpecHy3GPT-5.6 Sol
MakerTencentOpenAI
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window262K tokens1.1M tokens
Input price$0.13/M · free self-host$5/M
Output price$0.53/M · free self-host$30/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityHy3GPT-5.6 Sol
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Hy3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Hy3 delivers 33× more intelligence per dollar.
Hy3
GPT-5.6 Sol
Intelligence index
41.2
58.9
Coding index
58.8
77.4
GPQA
89.7%
94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
31.6%
47.2%
Long Context Reasoning
66.7%
73.7%
SciCode
47.6%
56.1%
τ-Bench Banking
20.8%
33%
Terminal-Bench
64.4%
88%
IFBench
72.7%
τ²-Bench
85.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
65.9%
Speed
68.6 tok/s
71.7 tok/s
Latency
1.68s
56.83s
Intelligence per $
171
5.2

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Hy3 and GPT-5.6 Sol score

🏆 Best value & openness: Hy3 (4.5 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionHy3GPT-5.6 Sol
Cost-efficiency5.03.0
Context window4.05.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Hy3 Open

Tencent · Open-weight

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...

GPT-5.6 Sol Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for complex reasoning, coding, and agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at command-line and multi-step coding tasks...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Hy3 previewHunyuan A13B Instruct

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 as good as GPT-5.6 Sol?

Hy3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but GPT-5.6 Sol may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Hy3 locally?

Yes. Hy3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. GPT-5.6 Sol is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Hy3?

Hy3 costs $0.53/M output vs $30/M for GPT-5.6 Sol — roughly 57x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Hy3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →