AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Granite 4.0 Micro Open vs Claude Opus 4.8 Paid

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Claude Opus 4.8 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Granite 4.0 Micro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Claude Opus 4.8 specs

SpecGranite 4.0 MicroClaude Opus 4.8
MakerIBMAnthropic
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window131K tokens1M tokens
Input price$0.02/M · free self-host$5/M
Output price$0.11/M · free self-host$25/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingNoYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityGranite 4.0 MicroClaude Opus 4.8
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Granite 4.0 Micro vs Claude Opus 4.8

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Granite 4.0 Micro
Claude Opus 4.8
Intelligence index
2.4
55.7
Math index
6
GPQA
33.6%
92%
MMLU-Pro
44.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.1%
45.7%
Long Context Reasoning
4%
67.7%
LiveCodeBench
18%
SciCode
11.9%
53.5%
AIME 2025
6%
IFBench
24.8%
62.2%
τ²-Bench
12.6%
94.4%
Terminal-Bench Hard
1.5%
58.3%
Coding index
74.3
τ-Bench Banking
27.6%
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
Speed
0 tok/s
62.5 tok/s
Latency
0s
28.57s
Intelligence per $
5.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Granite 4.0 Micro and Claude Opus 4.8 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Granite 4.0 Micro (4.1 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionGranite 4.0 MicroClaude Opus 4.8
Cost-efficiency5.03.0
Context window3.55.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Granite 4.0 Micro Open

IBM · Open-weight

Granite-4.0-H-Micro is a 3B parameter from the Granite 4 family of models. These models are the latest in a series of models released by IBM. They are fine-tuned for long...

Claude Opus 4.8 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's most capable generally available model in the Opus family. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and a 1M-token...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Granite 4.1 8B
Other variants tracked
Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.6

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro as good as Claude Opus 4.8?

Granite 4.0 Micro is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Claude Opus 4.8 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Granite 4.0 Micro locally?

Yes. Granite 4.0 Micro has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Claude Opus 4.8 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Granite 4.0 Micro?

Granite 4.0 Micro costs $0.11/M output vs $25/M for Claude Opus 4.8 — roughly 227x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Claude Opus 4.8 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Granite 4.0 Micro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →