DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Fable 5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Claude Fable 5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Anthropic |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Input price | $0.09/M · free self-host | $10/M |
| Output price | $0.19/M · free self-host | $50/M |
| Vision / multimodal | No | Yes |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Capability | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✓ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is an efficiency-optimized Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 284B total parameters and 13B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for fast inference and...
Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Claude Fable 5 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Yes. DeepSeek V4 Flash has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Claude Fable 5 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.19/M output vs $50/M for Claude Fable 5 — roughly 263x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Fable 5 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →